Legal Momentum hosted a roundtable discussion of tradeswomen, policy experts, and researchers to discuss the revision of federal construction regulations and strategies to increase the number and retention of women on federally-funded construction sites. Equality Works Program Manager Françoise Jacobsohn and Legal Momentum Interim President Rachael N. Pine were pleased to welcome Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP) Director Patricia Shiu, Women’s Bureau Director Sara Manzano-Diaz, and other representatives from the Department of Labor to the discussion. Participants emphasized the importance of early regulations and enforcement in reducing barriers to women’s employment in non-traditional jobs.
In collaboration with the Family Violence Prevention Fund and other partners, Legal Momentum developed Workplaces Respond, a resource center that provides tools for employers to obtain information and assistance in creating workplace policies addressing domestic, sexual, and dating violence and stalking. The Resource Center was created and funded as a result of Legal Momentum’s advocacy during and after the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in 2005.
National Judicial
Education Program Director Lynn Hecht Schafran recently attended the
first-ever White House national roundtable on sexual violence, sponsored
by the Office on Violence Against Women and the White House Council on
Women and Girls. The discussion centered on strategies to educate the
public about the realities of sexual assault as opposed to the myths,
prevent sexual violence, ensure that victims have access to effective
service providers, and hold perpetrators accountable.
In conjunction
with the event, President Obama announced a national campaign to reduce
sexual violence and increased funding for the Sexual Assault Kit Backlog
Action Research Project.
On October
21st, the White House’s National Economic Council released Jobs and
Economic Security for America’s Women, a report that details the
Obama Administration’s efforts to promote economic opportunity and
employment for women since President Obama took office in 2009.
Many of the
President’s policies discussed in the report have benefited women. Small
business loans, investments in education and health care jobs,
promoting opportunities for low-income workers (many of whom are
women—these efforts have created and/or saved millions of women’s jobs.
But the White
House must go further to ensure women’s long-term economic security.
Legal Momentum
is a National Ally for Vision 2020, a national project that seeks to
launch an action agenda to move the United States toward gender equality
by 2020, the centennial celebration of the 19th Amendment. On October
21-22, 2010, Vision 2020 sponsored "An American Conversation about Women
and Leadership" in Philadelphia, featuring panels about increasing
women’s leadership in all fields, from Law to Finance to Arts and
Culture.
Lorelie Masters
of Jenner & Block LLP served as a Vision 2010 Delegate from
Washington, DC. She reflected on the conference in a series of blog
posts for Legal Momentum, contributing pieces on the panels related to
women and leadership in Business, Law and Finance; Health; Education;
Media and Communications; and Engineering, Science, and Technology. She
also contributed a piece on Gender Inequality in the Media.
According to
the World Economic Forum’s 2010 Global Gender Gap Index, released
October 12th, the United States’ gender gap has narrowed. The U.S.
jumped from 31st place in 2009 to 19th place in 2010, a cheerful
indication of progress in education and literacy equality.
But the leap from
31 to 19 obscures a systematic workplace problem: gender wage
inequality. The U.S. ranked 64th in wage equality for similar work,
behind such countries as Kenya, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates.
The World Economic Forum attributes the U.S.’s ratings jump to gender equity in literacy and primary, secondary, and higher education. Indeed, much has been made of American women’s educational achievement in the past few decades—as it should be. But the Global Gender Gap Index demonstrates that, in the U.S., advanced degrees don’t translate into increased wages: the pay gap between men and women for similar work still hasn’t narrowed.
France prides
itself on maintaining remarkable state-run social programs that
particularly benefit women. French women are offered free nursery
schools for their children, Perineal therapy, tax deductions for each
child, family discounts on trains, and substantial family allowances.
They are encouraged to return to work after childbirth, a move that
seems to defy the age-old choice between work and family.
Despite its
progressive social programs, French gender inequality persists. France
ranks 46th in the World Economic Forum's 2010 gender equality
report. Only one of France’s top companies is run by a woman, and even
childless women in their forties earn 17 percent less than men. While
eighty-two percent of French women aged 25–49 work, 82 percent of
parliamentary seats are filled by men, despite a law complying political
parties to have the same number of men and women candidates on their
party lists. Parties have typically opted to pay the fines rather than
oblige.
The
Washington Post recently featured a thought-provoking piece by
historian Stephanie Coontz concerning television’s critically-acclaimed
"Mad Men." Coontz explains that while historians usually deride
historical fiction for its inaccuracies, most historians Coontz knows
(herself included) adore "Mad Men," particularly for its attention to
historical accuracy, down to the smallest 1960s details.
Recently,
however, a few non-historian "Mad Men" critics have complained that the
show exaggerates 1960s American sexism and the narrow range of choices
available to women because of it. The character Joan Harris’s decision
to marry her fiancé after he raped her, for example, riled many viewers,
who wondered why she would ever marry (instead of prosecute) such a
man. One critic complained, "[T]his year’s show takes place in 1965, not
the stone age."
Coontz highlights and dismantles this criticism to underscore how few legal rights women had in the 1960s—especially when it came to intimate partner violence.