Education
Education
-
Determined whether the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits a state from excluding men from a public nursing college.
-
Concerned challenging UT Austin's admission plan. The amicus brief was for respondent UT Austin, arguing for the Court to uphold UT Austin’s admission plan and prior Court opinions holding the educational benefits of diversity are a compelling interest permitting colleges and universities to use in narrowly-tailored individualized review of applicants.
-
Concerned the trial court's decision to exclude football from its consideration of a Title IX case regarding the amount of money spent on men's and women's sports.
-
Determined the right of a homosexual student to sue for peer-to-peer sexual harassment under §1983 and the 14th Amendment.
-
Determined whether Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination by federally funded educational institutions, precludes claims of unconstitutional gender discrimination in the schools.
-
Determined the right to sue schools for peer-to-peer sexual harassment under Title IX and § 1983.
-
Addressed a challenge to the three-part participation test for compliance with Title IX promulgated by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.
-
Determined whether money damages are available under Title IX.
-
Whether Congress intended for Title IX, the law prohibiting sex discrimination in schools that receive federal funds, to be a private right of action.
-
Determined whether a state athletic association acts “under color of” state law, 42 U.S.C. §1983, and is therefore subject to constitutional scrutiny.
- 1 of 3
- ››
Contact Us
OFFICES
16 East 34th Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10016
(212) 925-6635
HelpLine: 212-925-6635 ext. 650
NOTE: We do not take walk-in requests for assistance.
You must make an appointment in advance.
Request Help: help@legalmomentum.org
Media Inquiries: pressinfo@legalmomentum.org
Donations and Events: friends@legalmomentum.org
Website Issues/Other Inquiries: info@legalmomentum.org