Education
If you are being watched, leave now!
-
Determined whether a males-only admission policy at a state-run institution violates the Equal Protection Clause.
-
Determined whether a state athletic association acts “under color of” state law, 42 U.S.C. §1983, and is therefore subject to constitutional scrutiny.
-
Addressed a challenge to the three-part participation test for compliance with Title IX promulgated by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.
-
Determined the right of a homosexual student to sue for peer-to-peer sexual harassment under §1983 and the 14th Amendment.
-
Determined whether the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits a state from excluding men from a public nursing college.
-
Determined the right to sue a university for expulsion in retaliation for complaining of sexual harassment under Title IX.
-
Determined whether a person who is retaliated against for complaining of sex discrimination in federally-funded education programs may bring a lawsuit for damages under Title IX.
-
Determined whether Arizona State University is liable under Title IX for the rape of a student by another student who was known to be a serial sexual harasser.
-
Determined the constitutionality of affirmative action programs in publicly-funded schools and universities.
-
Determined whether an entire university is subject to Title IX if only one particular university program receives federal funds.
-
Determined the right to sue schools for teacher-to-student sexual harassment under Title IX.
-
G.G., a transgender highschool student, sued the Gloucester County School Board for a Title IX violation after they instituted a policy designed to prevent him from using boys' restrooms.
Pages
