Employment and Work
If you are being watched, leave now!
-
Determined whether an employer who refuses to accept applications from women with pre-school age children violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
-
Defended the policy of prohibiting employers from using applicants’ prior pay to determine compensation, in hopes of reducing the wage gap.
-
Concerned the sexual harassment and sex discrimination at work based on rumors of a female employee "sleeping with her male boss to obtain promotions."
-
Determined the right to unemployment benefits when a woman is forced to quit job due to domestic violence.
-
Determined whether Title VII's prohibition against workplace sexual harassment applies to same-sex sexual harassment.
-
The U.S. District Court erred in denying Plaintiffs’ class-action motion by failing to consider the anecdotal evidence submitted to prove companywide bias practices.
-
Concerned punitive damages in a sexual harassment case.
-
Regarding delays in the conciliation process for employment discrimination complaints, particularly as it harms women in non-traditional fields.
-
Determined that the requirements for the timely filing of federal employment discrimination claims are regulated by the facts of the case, not a bright-line rule.
-
Determined the right of an employee to sue her employer for pay discrimination if she does not bring her claim within 180 days of her employer's pay decision.
-
Determined whether the treatment from the employer to a pregnant employee violates the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
-
Determined whether an employer's conduct has to be "egregious" or "outrageous" in order to sustain an award of punitive damages under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Pages
